I decided, in my procrastination* of packing for the summer, to lay out a quick guide to Arts One reading, group A. Since it is the second year of these readings, it is time for an adjustment of the book list, but here's to you hoping it won't change too much. Anyways, a flash guide to the reading list of 2011/2012:
*Also, don't do this too much. Soon, you will have accumulated days, not hours, on the couches in the commonsblock, most of which was watching reruns of Seinfeld and How I Met Your Mother, telling yourself that after just the next one you will write a paragraph or two, that inspiration is in that very paragraph, and you know, deep down, that it really isn't, but somehow you will find a way to finish just before the time runs out and you will make it back to bed with the bittersweet feeling that although you finished a not-quite as good as it can be paper, you will be going to sleep and happily forget how miserable you were until the week after next when the cycle renews itself.
Book of Genesis
Eat an apple, go through remarkable pain once a month–for women only. For men, you get a slap on the wrist and an eternity with women who now have this monthly gut-punching.
Kant What is Enlightenment/Conjectural Beginning of Human History
Giving the finger to God and getting kicked out of Eden? Good thing.
Irvine Socrates on Trial
...cannot remember ...come back
Plato Euthyphro
...cannot remember
Sophocles Oedipus
Parents worried that their son would sleep with his mother and kill his father, so, of course, they made sure of it happening. They find out, it gets bloody. Kids are probably scarred for life.
Seneca Oedipus Tyrannus
See Sophocles, except make it into a soap opera and add more vaginal stabbings.
Plato The Republic
Philosophers are the best, everyone else are just sheep. We have metals in blood, meaning if you do not have a good metal, you are screwed. Also, man escapes from cave in Allegory of the Cave; men are given the chance to choose good/evil, they choose the opposite everytime they die, philosophers are the only ones who know what's up, of course.
Machiavelli The Prince
Lie, cheat, steal, and know your history to be a good prince. Don't be an idiot.
Marlowe Doctor Faustus
It may seem like a good idea to get everything you wanted for, you know, nothing big, but just your soul... it's not. Generally, trades with the devil, not a wise idea.
Brecht Life of Galileo
The Church is always right, even when it's wrong. Galileo was essentially given a horse head under his covers to shut up.
Shakespeare Hamlet
Doesn't do anything, ever... and when he does, he fucks shit up. All because he is an emo child.
Rousseau Discours on the Origin of Inequality
We were better off as post-Eden apes.
Shelley Frankenstein
Man builds monster, realises he built monster, chaos.
Lippman The Scopes Trial
The American South was a scary place.
Nietzsche On the Geneology of Morality
...forgot/no fucking clue
Wells Island of Dr. Moreau
Cutting open animals while still alive, good thing?
Chopin The Awakening
Spoiler: She kills herself.
Freud Dora, Sexuality, etc.
Subconsciously, all you want to do is sleep around with your father (or mother).
Foucault History of Sexuality Vol. I
Is the war on sexuality being waged? This one was a bugger...
Plath Bell Jar
...
Else The Case of Robert J Oppenheimer
Man builds bomb, realises he built bomb, chaos.
DeLillo End Zone
A stoned football player questions football.
Walter The Zero
Did not get this far in my readings.
McCarthy The Road
All hope is lost... Also, humans will scare the shit out of you after this one.
I will come back to revise and finish this, but, for now, that is pretty much Group A's list.
This is a blog, a blog about a boy in university. That boy might be cool. We shall see.
samedi 28 avril 2012
vendredi 27 avril 2012
Summer Project
Just like "Julie & Julia," Aurora and I have a little blogging project that we will be doing this summer. In my obsession with everything Columbia (I mean, who takes a picture of Columbia St. and Broadway... in Vancouver?!), I was browsing the Lit Hum reading list and noticed how similar it was, in structure, to my Arts One class. Brushing off the bit of pride, it became a personal goal of mine to try and read through that list, a list towering alongside my Arts One education, a right Seneca and Sophocles. Well, in telling Aurora, we took the challenge together and, this summer, we will be mixing sharp wit with some good, old-fashion discussion. We also rose the stakes, seeing some of the selections as 'simple' (or rather seeing the Gospel week and looking back on our Catholic education), and decided to raise their books with ours along with a great film ending each section. So, without further ado, here is the tentative structure of our plan:
Section I (6 May - 20 May):
Homer Iliad
Hymn to Demeter
Homer Odyssey
Film:
Section II (21 May - 7 June):
[I needed to extend it because of my Hungarian class]
Herodotus Histories
Aeschylus The Oresteia
Sophocles Oedipus
Seneca Oedipus Tyrannus
Film:
Section III (8 June - 22 June):
Euripides Medea
Thucydides History of the Peloponnesian War
Aristophanes Lysistrata
Plato Symposium
Film: Manhattan / Annie Hall [Woodie Allen]
Section IV (23 June - 7 July):
Book of Genesis
Book of Job
Gospel of Luke
Gospel of John
Selected works from the Quran
Selected works from the Torah
Film:
Section V (8 July - 22 July):
Virgil Aeneid
Augustine Confessions
Dante Inferno
Film:
Section VI (23 July - 6 August):
Boccaccio The Decameron
Montaigne Essays
Shakespeare King Lear
Film:
Section VII (7 August - 21 August):
Cervantes Don Quixote
Shakespear Hamlet
Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice
Film:
Section VIII (22 August - 5 September):
Dostoevsky Crime and Punishment
Woolf To the Lighthouse
Nietzsche On the Geneology of Morality
Film:
Section IX (5 September - 19 September):
Sartre Being and Nothingness
Foucault Histoire de la Sexualité/History of Sexuality
Kant Critique of Pure Reason
Film:
Section I (6 May - 20 May):
Homer Iliad
Hymn to Demeter
Homer Odyssey
Film:
Section II (21 May - 7 June):
[I needed to extend it because of my Hungarian class]
Herodotus Histories
Aeschylus The Oresteia
Sophocles Oedipus
Seneca Oedipus Tyrannus
Film:
Section III (8 June - 22 June):
Euripides Medea
Thucydides History of the Peloponnesian War
Aristophanes Lysistrata
Plato Symposium
Film: Manhattan / Annie Hall [Woodie Allen]
Section IV (23 June - 7 July):
Book of Genesis
Book of Job
Gospel of Luke
Gospel of John
Selected works from the Quran
Selected works from the Torah
Film:
Section V (8 July - 22 July):
Virgil Aeneid
Augustine Confessions
Dante Inferno
Film:
Section VI (23 July - 6 August):
Boccaccio The Decameron
Montaigne Essays
Shakespeare King Lear
Film:
Section VII (7 August - 21 August):
Cervantes Don Quixote
Shakespear Hamlet
Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice
Film:
Section VIII (22 August - 5 September):
Dostoevsky Crime and Punishment
Woolf To the Lighthouse
Nietzsche On the Geneology of Morality
Film:
Section IX (5 September - 19 September):
Sartre Being and Nothingness
Foucault Histoire de la Sexualité/History of Sexuality
Kant Critique of Pure Reason
Film:
jeudi 26 avril 2012
The Battle of the Stations
Have you ever read something that you just needed to share it? Mixing transit, New York, Columbia, wit, and education, this article captured my attention such that I needed to share it, not just wanted to. So, here it is, in its entirety. Enjoy!
A Battle of Subway Stops—Is 116th Superior to 110th?
A Battle of Subway Stops—Is 116th Superior to 110th?
Victoria Wills and Mark Hay engage in a battle of local subway stops. Read this and more in the upcoming April issue of The Blue & White.
AFFIRMATIVE—116th or Bust
by Victoria Wills
by Victoria Wills
Mark asked me to commit.
He wanted me to pick a side, buy a ticket, and follow him all the way. What Mark failed to mention is that once you’re in, the only way out is the way you came. He asked me to meet him at the 110th stop.
It’s not the first time he’s pulled this. For weeks, Mark has tried yanking me away from 116th. Which is to say, distancing me from all that is beautiful, all that is familiar, all that sits close to home. In both proximity and aesthetics, 116th personifies what I value; Mark has proven time and time again that he just doesn’t give a shit.
A relationship means meeting in the middle, and Mark can’t seem to grasp that. Things have to be his way. If he opened his mind for even a moment, he might realize that there is absolutely no logical reason to walk six extra blocks to the subway.
Sure, he’ll probably give you some anachronistic, aphoristic wisdom about the merits of strolling Broadway—some of that Baudelairean hogwash he tends to spew. For all his talk of superiority, Mark is no more than a manipulative, pseudointellectual name-dropper, unable to face reality.
Fine. I can play his game. To borrow Mark’s pretentious rhetoric: why, if more intellectually stimulating, does the journey to the 110th dump the unlucky rider in The Cave? The 110th stop is claustrophobic. It is poorly lit, noisy, and has no windows to the outside world. Devoid of the lofty arched ceilings and tiled mosaic of my beloved 116th, that southerly station feels placeless—a dark world of meaningless shadows.
But petty intellection misses the mark: my opponent is entirely oblivious. Doesn’t he see that I need my space, that I need options? I take comfort in knowing that, having entered a station with someone on the east side of Broadway, I can still go uptown while she goes down; I can even leave the station entirely. I like knowing that there are two staircases, and I that can choose either one. I like knowing that even after a 45-minute trip from Brooklyn, I can duck out at the 115th exit. It’s about the high ceilings; it’s about having room to breathe.
If anything, Mark’s choice of 110th over 116th reflects his poor understanding of what a girl wants, what a girl needs. A good relationship with your subway station is of the utmost importance.
Like Mark, 110th comes on all too strong. 116th eases you into things. It’s like the mandatory 24-hour period before calling after the first date.
Like Mark, the 110th stop steals you away from yourself. At 116th, you can hear birds, smell the NUTZ4NUTZ, feel sunlight, and see flakes of snow fall through the metal grates. It allows you to be in the relationship, but keep your independent interests. It doesn’t go into your iTunes and delete all your guilty-pleasure ’90s girl-pop.
Like Mark, 110th is the paranoid boyfriend who doesn’t let you chat up the guy in the ticket booth.
In fact, the station is so hostile, ticket-sellers don’t deign to set up shop there. Sometimes you need that face-to-face connection. I’m not asking for physical contact, but is it so bad to like a man in uniform?
At least tell me this: when you have $1.90 left on your Metrocards, who, Mark, will consolidate them? Not anyone at the 110th station, and certainly not me.
NEGATIVE—110th All the Way
by Mark Hay
by Mark Hay
Victoria thinks I’m making this all about me, me, me. She acts like I’m trying to control her, to own her, to lock her down in this one-way stairway to what I presume she thinks is a living hell.
Well, though most Columbians do see it that way, the borderlands of 110th are not the River Lethe; each successive subway stop south of 116th is not another circle of Hell. Manhattan Valley was not laid out by Dante Alighieri. Nor is it about commitment. My insistence on using the 110th subway stop is about self-respect, dedication, and an everyday practical education that Little Miss Columbia Bubble 2014 needs to drill into her head if she wants to make it in the real world.
Because that’s what the 110th stop is: The Real World. Where people stop being polite and start getting real. Or at least they stop being anthropology majors and start getting real jobs.
Victoria tries to convince me to meet her at 116th because it has choices. It’s a station made for someone who comes tearing in at the last minute, having miscalculated the time, but knows that just so long as they make it to any corner of 116th, they’ll be fine. But 110th takes preci- sion. It takes situational awareness and knowledge of one’s geography.
110th is for those who sharpen their minds in their everyday lives and believe in forethought and punctuality. 116th is for people who can’t live without iPhone navigation and a constant connection to GCal.
But, Victoria protests, it’s not all about the entrances. It’s about proximity. It makes no sense for her to hoof it all the way to 110th. And to that I say for shame, Victoria, for shame. You are truly a sloth. I bet you order all of your food via GrubHub. We scholars are an atrophied breed. If you have ever stood out front of Butler, you will realize that all the students within and hipsters without are chicken-legged and brittle. They hobble on their stilt-shins over to the nearest subway station and cling to the pole for dear life. But those who choose 110th, regardless of (or in fact due to) its distance, are of a heartier stock. We live our lives with health in mind. We are the Greek ideal of balance between physical and mental education; Juvenal’s mens sana in corpore sano. I especially pride myself on the maintenance of calves that can only be adequately described as majestic. True, we are Columbians, and 116th is “our spot.” But what does it do to us to linger under- ground and stare at walls glorifying our names, to see our institution hailed as the ultimate end of all travels? 116th is the death of humility and the greatest ego boost ever to poison Morningside Heights.
110th is escape from the Ivory Tower. It is the physical manifestation of its riders’ balanced minds and bodies and their noble, humble spirit. 110th is a reality check with regard to one’s place at Columbia; it asks that acute attention be paid to even our smallest actions. It challenges our identities and pathetic Ivy superiority complexes.
110th is sublime, profound. And that’s why my love of the 110th stop makes me so much better than you, Victoria. It makes me so much better as a human being. So much better.
Original article can be viewed here: The Bwog.
vendredi 20 avril 2012
I do not generally do this...
This video is just absolutely stunning. Tears were forming in my eyes. Please, just take two minutes, watch this.
lundi 16 avril 2012
Why do I watch Glee?
Yes, I am a self-proclaimed Gleek. Each week, I love catching up on my McKinley High gossip and news; I am getting excited and impatient over the impending graduation.
But, why?
I know Glee is not that good of a show. It is good, indeed, but nowhere near the excellence of, let's say, Game of Thrones. The audience is pretty split as well, those who really love the show, those pretty 'meh' towards the whole thing, and those who just do not like this television programme. For me, it is a getaway, a sort of escape from reality, and God knows, everyone needs a little escapism in this climate.
But, really digging down, why doesAmerica the world like glee so much? Every week, a bunch of new songs come on accompanied by some high school gossip, new relationship, or dramatic experience. Some songs are brilliant, some are just ok. I think it really boils down to the 'goofy' aspect in the show.
I mean, the show is pretty goofy, you have to admit. It is like every high school stereotype and caricature put into one place... in the middle of Ohio, of all places. But, it is the return to fantastical, musical shows of the '50s and '60s which have really not resurfaced properly in decades. Musical films, like "Singin' in the Rain" and "An American in Paris" really combined the sort of escapism and goofiness that Glee is offering, and it does it notably for the first time in decades. I mean, of course, there have been musical films and programmes since then, but the 1950s have become so romanticised in American's heads that a return to it via prime time television is natural.
So, the reason why I like Glee? It is America's way to return to a quote-on-quote "simpler" time. It is a return to the fantastical and the musical, and it combines it in a way where viewers really do not need to think, they can just watch, or "veg out" as my dad would always say.
But, why?
But, really digging down, why does
I mean, the show is pretty goofy, you have to admit. It is like every high school stereotype and caricature put into one place... in the middle of Ohio, of all places. But, it is the return to fantastical, musical shows of the '50s and '60s which have really not resurfaced properly in decades. Musical films, like "Singin' in the Rain" and "An American in Paris" really combined the sort of escapism and goofiness that Glee is offering, and it does it notably for the first time in decades. I mean, of course, there have been musical films and programmes since then, but the 1950s have become so romanticised in American's heads that a return to it via prime time television is natural.
So, the reason why I like Glee? It is America's way to return to a quote-on-quote "simpler" time. It is a return to the fantastical and the musical, and it combines it in a way where viewers really do not need to think, they can just watch, or "veg out" as my dad would always say.
jeudi 12 avril 2012
A Case for Space
I think I have an idea where to go to graduate school, and I hope it is not just a pipe dream stemming from watching Star Trek this afternoon: International Space University. Haven't heard of it? Me neither, which is a real shame. In looking into it, it is probably one of the coolest ideas I have seen in a while... and it has been around for 25 years. If it is so "old", why is it so unknown? I mean, it is a graduate school focused on space studies in all aspects that harbours an international, inter-cultural perspective. Honestly, I think it is how the world is viewing space: we really aren't.
Recently, I heard NASA is planning a flyover of the space shuttle to garner attention and try to bring back that gung-ho space attitude of the '60s/'70s. Personally, I think they are going about it all wrong. We all know that space race was just that, a race against the Soviet Union. The entire American public was in danger during the Cold War and needed to get 'control' of space before the "commies" did. It was this sort of dire need for space rather than interest for the sake of interest that built NASA, the shuttle, and the entire space programme. Today, we are only trying to push interest for the sake of interest. NASA is trying to get people interested in a subject that we, technically, do not need to be interested in. And we all know how lazy Americans can be*.
(* Jokes. Sort of.)
This initiative is only partially getting headlines, penetrating only select spheres of news, though. I found it because I have a deep love for space. If you are not really looking, there is a good chance you will miss most of what NASA says; NASA is just not making headlines any longer. But what is? Really, what is bursting through all the spheres and getting attention? What is the type of news that blasts through Facebook with no stopping? Google Glass. At least that was the most recent burst of interest. That product featurette cleared through most of the channels watched. That made headlines. Before that, KONY 2012. What is it about these? A product and a social movement. Now, I could go on and on about the social aspeects of KONY and whatnot, but, really, what attracted attention was the neat design. It was cleaned up, offered nicely, and presented like a feature film. Both Google Glass and KONY offered the public great design and something to lust after, something just beyond their reach. I mean, look at what rakes in the most about of money: feature films. At the box office, most recently, the Hunger Games brought in 300$ million as of its third weekend. 300$ million! One satellite for Seti only costs 2.5$ million. The public loves new ideas and cleaned up, well-designed products.
But, what could NASA, or any space agency, do? Well, design for the public. Rather than try to reignite that Space Race flame, cater to the new, younger crowd, the crowd weined on new technology and pretty designs, the crowd with the attention span of an ant. I am sure NASA has some pretty impressive design ideas up their sleeves, now it is time to polish some, hell, even make some more really pushing toward the public interest. Space agencies need to really bring interest back into space, and, in my opinion, the only way to do just that would give the public something to drool over, something straight out of J.J. Abram's Star Trek. If NASA were to release legitimate concept designs for an overhaul or update to the ISS, or, perhaps, a new ship that may be lacking in proper fuel efficieny but looks as if it could go to the red planet in style, I am pretty sure there would be a little more public interest.
I mean, look at these images, they are the face of a space-faring society, but we have no interest... An image like this 100 years ago would have launched several nations into the deep nothingness above us; today they are taken for nothing. Please, NASA and ESA and whatever other space agency is out there, push this design aspect. Plan things with set goals in mind, futuristic goals. The International Space University is one of the coolest things I have seen, and, with time, it could become the equivalent to Star Fleet Academy, but, their public design only attacks the "now" model of space, the, I need to say it, outdated, groups of men and women behind computers, "Houston, we have a problem" model. If they could advertise a new future, make it more accessible to more people, push for a futuristic stand point, I am sure that interest would pique, or at least be renewed for this generation.
Recently, I heard NASA is planning a flyover of the space shuttle to garner attention and try to bring back that gung-ho space attitude of the '60s/'70s. Personally, I think they are going about it all wrong. We all know that space race was just that, a race against the Soviet Union. The entire American public was in danger during the Cold War and needed to get 'control' of space before the "commies" did. It was this sort of dire need for space rather than interest for the sake of interest that built NASA, the shuttle, and the entire space programme. Today, we are only trying to push interest for the sake of interest. NASA is trying to get people interested in a subject that we, technically, do not need to be interested in. And we all know how lazy Americans can be*.(* Jokes. Sort of.)
This initiative is only partially getting headlines, penetrating only select spheres of news, though. I found it because I have a deep love for space. If you are not really looking, there is a good chance you will miss most of what NASA says; NASA is just not making headlines any longer. But what is? Really, what is bursting through all the spheres and getting attention? What is the type of news that blasts through Facebook with no stopping? Google Glass. At least that was the most recent burst of interest. That product featurette cleared through most of the channels watched. That made headlines. Before that, KONY 2012. What is it about these? A product and a social movement. Now, I could go on and on about the social aspeects of KONY and whatnot, but, really, what attracted attention was the neat design. It was cleaned up, offered nicely, and presented like a feature film. Both Google Glass and KONY offered the public great design and something to lust after, something just beyond their reach. I mean, look at what rakes in the most about of money: feature films. At the box office, most recently, the Hunger Games brought in 300$ million as of its third weekend. 300$ million! One satellite for Seti only costs 2.5$ million. The public loves new ideas and cleaned up, well-designed products.
But, what could NASA, or any space agency, do? Well, design for the public. Rather than try to reignite that Space Race flame, cater to the new, younger crowd, the crowd weined on new technology and pretty designs, the crowd with the attention span of an ant. I am sure NASA has some pretty impressive design ideas up their sleeves, now it is time to polish some, hell, even make some more really pushing toward the public interest. Space agencies need to really bring interest back into space, and, in my opinion, the only way to do just that would give the public something to drool over, something straight out of J.J. Abram's Star Trek. If NASA were to release legitimate concept designs for an overhaul or update to the ISS, or, perhaps, a new ship that may be lacking in proper fuel efficieny but looks as if it could go to the red planet in style, I am pretty sure there would be a little more public interest.
I mean, look at these images, they are the face of a space-faring society, but we have no interest... An image like this 100 years ago would have launched several nations into the deep nothingness above us; today they are taken for nothing. Please, NASA and ESA and whatever other space agency is out there, push this design aspect. Plan things with set goals in mind, futuristic goals. The International Space University is one of the coolest things I have seen, and, with time, it could become the equivalent to Star Fleet Academy, but, their public design only attacks the "now" model of space, the, I need to say it, outdated, groups of men and women behind computers, "Houston, we have a problem" model. If they could advertise a new future, make it more accessible to more people, push for a futuristic stand point, I am sure that interest would pique, or at least be renewed for this generation.vendredi 6 avril 2012
It has been a while...
I have loads to say and no time, so this post will just be a "I am coming back, I swear."
But, much has happened since I last posted. I just got done with my last class in first year. I did not set any fires or kill anything, which is good. So, yeah.
See you soon!
But, much has happened since I last posted. I just got done with my last class in first year. I did not set any fires or kill anything, which is good. So, yeah.
See you soon!
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)



